1 Start 2 Complete Thank you for recently attending the Educational Faculty Development 2020-2021 Series. We kindly ask that you complete this evaluation. Your evaluation and comments are helpful to us for planning future conferences. APA credit In order to receive APA credit please fill in your name here: What is your occupation or level of participation in this forum? MD/DO PhD PsyD NP PA RN Other, please specify: Occupation Other, please specify: Overall Activity Evaluation ExcellentVery GoodGoodFairPoor How would you rate this educational activity overall? How would you rate this educational activity overall? - Excellent How would you rate this educational activity overall? - Very Good How would you rate this educational activity overall? - Good How would you rate this educational activity overall? - Fair How would you rate this educational activity overall? - Poor How relevant to your needs was the information presented? How relevant to your needs was the information presented? - Excellent How relevant to your needs was the information presented? - Very Good How relevant to your needs was the information presented? - Good How relevant to your needs was the information presented? - Fair How relevant to your needs was the information presented? - Poor How clear was the material presented? How clear was the material presented? - Excellent How clear was the material presented? - Very Good How clear was the material presented? - Good How clear was the material presented? - Fair How clear was the material presented? - Poor How well were questions answered? How well were questions answered? - Excellent How well were questions answered? - Very Good How well were questions answered? - Good How well were questions answered? - Fair How well were questions answered? - Poor Learning Objectives How well were the Learning Objectives of this activity met? At the conclusion of this program, participants should be able to: ExcellentVery GoodGoodFairPoor Describe the evidence showing bias in evaluations based on gender and underrepresented-in-medicine status Describe the evidence showing bias in evaluations based on gender and underrepresented-in-medicine status - Excellent Describe the evidence showing bias in evaluations based on gender and underrepresented-in-medicine status - Very Good Describe the evidence showing bias in evaluations based on gender and underrepresented-in-medicine status - Good Describe the evidence showing bias in evaluations based on gender and underrepresented-in-medicine status - Fair Describe the evidence showing bias in evaluations based on gender and underrepresented-in-medicine status - Poor Identify instances of potential bias in evaluations and letters of recommendation Identify instances of potential bias in evaluations and letters of recommendation - Excellent Identify instances of potential bias in evaluations and letters of recommendation - Very Good Identify instances of potential bias in evaluations and letters of recommendation - Good Identify instances of potential bias in evaluations and letters of recommendation - Fair Identify instances of potential bias in evaluations and letters of recommendation - Poor Apply strategies to reduce unintended differences in evaluations and letters of recommendation for medical students, residents, and faculty Apply strategies to reduce unintended differences in evaluations and letters of recommendation for medical students, residents, and faculty - Excellent Apply strategies to reduce unintended differences in evaluations and letters of recommendation for medical students, residents, and faculty - Very Good Apply strategies to reduce unintended differences in evaluations and letters of recommendation for medical students, residents, and faculty - Good Apply strategies to reduce unintended differences in evaluations and letters of recommendation for medical students, residents, and faculty - Fair Apply strategies to reduce unintended differences in evaluations and letters of recommendation for medical students, residents, and faculty - Poor Competencies To what extent has your knowledge and skills improved in the following competency areas as a result of this activity? Extreme ImprovementMuch ImprovementSomewhat ImprovementVery Little ImprovementNo Improvement Patient Care Patient Care - Extreme Improvement Patient Care - Much Improvement Patient Care - Somewhat Improvement Patient Care - Very Little Improvement Patient Care - No Improvement Medical Knowledge Medical Knowledge - Extreme Improvement Medical Knowledge - Much Improvement Medical Knowledge - Somewhat Improvement Medical Knowledge - Very Little Improvement Medical Knowledge - No Improvement Interpersonal and Communication Skills Interpersonal and Communication Skills - Extreme Improvement Interpersonal and Communication Skills - Much Improvement Interpersonal and Communication Skills - Somewhat Improvement Interpersonal and Communication Skills - Very Little Improvement Interpersonal and Communication Skills - No Improvement Professionalism Professionalism - Extreme Improvement Professionalism - Much Improvement Professionalism - Somewhat Improvement Professionalism - Very Little Improvement Professionalism - No Improvement Practice-Based Learning and Improvement Practice-Based Learning and Improvement - Extreme Improvement Practice-Based Learning and Improvement - Much Improvement Practice-Based Learning and Improvement - Somewhat Improvement Practice-Based Learning and Improvement - Very Little Improvement Practice-Based Learning and Improvement - No Improvement Systems-Based Practice Systems-Based Practice - Extreme Improvement Systems-Based Practice - Much Improvement Systems-Based Practice - Somewhat Improvement Systems-Based Practice - Very Little Improvement Systems-Based Practice - No Improvement Did you perceive any commercial bias during this activity? No Yes, please explain: Commercial Bias Yes, please explain: Most important thing What is the most important thing you learned by attending this activity and how will it affect your teaching abilities? Impact on your practice Will your participation in this activity have an impact on your practice of medicine, leadership performance, your research, or teaching abilities? Yes No Not sure Explain impact Please explain your response to the above question. Please describe any formative feedback that you received about your communication skills from program instructors. Barriers to change What barriers, if any, do you anticipate encountering as you make changes in your practice behavior? Speaker Evaluation: Rebekah L. Gardner, MD Very WellWellAverageDisappointingPoor Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Very Well Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Well Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Average Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Disappointing Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Poor Speaker communicated materials effectively Speaker communicated materials effectively - Very Well Speaker communicated materials effectively - Well Speaker communicated materials effectively - Average Speaker communicated materials effectively - Disappointing Speaker communicated materials effectively - Poor Questions were answered to your satisfaction Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Very Well Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Well Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Average Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Disappointing Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Poor Speaker Comments Please provide any comments you have for speaker Rebekah Gardner, MD Speaker Evaluation: Kate E. Cahill, MD Very WellWellAverageDisappointingPoor Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Very Well Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Well Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Average Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Disappointing Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Poor Speaker communicated materials effectively Speaker communicated materials effectively - Very Well Speaker communicated materials effectively - Well Speaker communicated materials effectively - Average Speaker communicated materials effectively - Disappointing Speaker communicated materials effectively - Poor Questions were answered to your satisfaction Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Very Well Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Well Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Average Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Disappointing Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Poor Speaker Comments: Kate E. Cahill, MD Please provide any comments you have for speaker Kate E. Cahill, MD Speaker Evaluation: Stephanie Catanese, MD Very WellWellAverageDisappointingPoor Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Very Well Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Well Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Average Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Disappointing Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Poor Speaker communicated materials effectively Speaker communicated materials effectively - Very Well Speaker communicated materials effectively - Well Speaker communicated materials effectively - Average Speaker communicated materials effectively - Disappointing Speaker communicated materials effectively - Poor Questions were answered to your satisfaction Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Very Well Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Well Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Average Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Disappointing Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Poor Speaker Comments: Stephanie Catanese, MD Please provide any comments you have for speaker Kate E. Cahill, MD Speaker Evaluation: Sarita S. Warrier, MD Very WellWellAverageDisappointingPoor Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Very Well Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Well Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Average Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Disappointing Speaker demonstrated interest and enthusiasm for teaching - Poor Speaker communicated materials effectively Speaker communicated materials effectively - Very Well Speaker communicated materials effectively - Well Speaker communicated materials effectively - Average Speaker communicated materials effectively - Disappointing Speaker communicated materials effectively - Poor Questions were answered to your satisfaction Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Very Well Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Well Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Average Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Disappointing Questions were answered to your satisfaction - Poor Speaker Comments: Sarita S. Warrier, MD Please provide any comments you have for speaker Sarita S. Warrier, MD Future topics We would like to invite your ideas for future Educational Faculty Development programs and speakers. What is the top theme you would like to see addressed at a professional development program/conference for faculty, house officers and trainees? Future speakers Who would you like to see as a keynote speaker/workshop presenter at an Educational Faculty Development program? Overall comments: Leave this field blank
