May Child and Adolescent Grand Rounds Evaluation

Overall Session Evaluation

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
How would you rate this educational activity overall?	How would you rate this educational activity overall? - Excellent	How would you rate this educational activity overall? - Very Good	How would you rate this educational activity overall? - Good	How would you rate this educational activity overall? - Fair	How would you rate this educational activity overall? - Poor
How relevant to your needs was the information presented?	How relevant to your needs was the information presented? - Excellent	How relevant to your needs was the information presented? - Very Good	How relevant to your needs was the information presented? - Good	How relevant to your needs was the information presented? - Fair	How relevant to your needs was the information presented? - Poor
How well were questions answered?	How well were questions answered? - Excellent	How well were questions answered? - Very Good	How well were questions answered? - Good	How well were questions answered? - Fair	How well were questions answered? - Poor

Was the content of this activity fair, balanced, objective, and free of commercial bias?

Yes

No

Was the content of this activity fair, balanced, objective, and free of commercial bias? No

How well were the Learning Objectives of this activity met overall?

At the conclusion of this program, participants should be able to:

	Extremely well	Very well	Moderately well	Slightly well	Not well at all
Explain how commonly held stereotypes about eating disorders add to the difficulty of diagnosing anorexia nervosa	Explain how commonly held stereotypes about eating disorders add to the difficulty of diagnosing anorexia nervosa - Extremely well	Explain how commonly held stereotypes about eating disorders add to the difficulty of diagnosing anorexia nervosa - Very well	Explain how commonly held stereotypes about eating disorders add to the difficulty of diagnosing anorexia nervosa - Moderately well	Explain how commonly held stereotypes about eating disorders add to the difficulty of diagnosing anorexia nervosa - Slightly well	Explain how commonly held stereotypes about eating disorders add to the difficulty of diagnosing anorexia nervosa - Not well at all
Understand the diagnostic criteria for atypical anorexia nervosa, including how it practically differs from low-weight anorexia nervosa	Understand the diagnostic criteria for atypical anorexia nervosa, including how it practically differs from low-weight anorexia nervosa - Extremely well	Understand the diagnostic criteria for atypical anorexia nervosa, including how it practically differs from low-weight anorexia nervosa - Very well	Understand the diagnostic criteria for atypical anorexia nervosa, including how it practically differs from low-weight anorexia nervosa - Moderately well	Understand the diagnostic criteria for atypical anorexia nervosa, including how it practically differs from low-weight anorexia nervosa - Slightly well	Understand the diagnostic criteria for atypical anorexia nervosa, including how it practically differs from low-weight anorexia nervosa - Not well at all
Apply evidence-based assessment and treatment approaches to a clinical case of atypical anorexia nervosa	Apply evidence-based assessment and treatment approaches to a clinical case of atypical anorexia nervosa - Extremely well	Apply evidence-based assessment and treatment approaches to a clinical case of atypical anorexia nervosa - Very well	Apply evidence-based assessment and treatment approaches to a clinical case of atypical anorexia nervosa - Moderately well	Apply evidence-based assessment and treatment approaches to a clinical case of atypical anorexia nervosa - Slightly well	Apply evidence-based assessment and treatment approaches to a clinical case of atypical anorexia nervosa - Not well at all

Will your participation in this activity have an impact on your practice, leadership, performance, or with your research?

Yes

No

Not Sure

Please explain your response to the previous question

What is the most important thing you learned by attending this activity and how will it affect you and your practice?

What topics would you like to see next year related to this conference?

Speaker Evaluation: Amy Egbert, Ph.D.

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
The speaker provided the information in an effective/interesting manner that facilitated my learning	The speaker provided the information in an effective/interesting manner that facilitated my learning - Excellent	The speaker provided the information in an effective/interesting manner that facilitated my learning - Very Good	The speaker provided the information in an effective/interesting manner that facilitated my learning - Good	The speaker provided the information in an effective/interesting manner that facilitated my learning - Fair	The speaker provided the information in an effective/interesting manner that facilitated my learning - Poor
Presentation was fair, objective, and unbiased toward any product or program	Presentation was fair, objective, and unbiased toward any product or program - Excellent	Presentation was fair, objective, and unbiased toward any product or program - Very Good	Presentation was fair, objective, and unbiased toward any product or program - Good	Presentation was fair, objective, and unbiased toward any product or program - Fair	Presentation was fair, objective, and unbiased toward any product or program - Poor

Speaker Evaluation: Christina Tortolani, PhD

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
The speaker provided the information in an effective/interesting manner that facilitated my learning	The speaker provided the information in an effective/interesting manner that facilitated my learning - Excellent	The speaker provided the information in an effective/interesting manner that facilitated my learning - Very Good	The speaker provided the information in an effective/interesting manner that facilitated my learning - Good	The speaker provided the information in an effective/interesting manner that facilitated my learning - Fair	The speaker provided the information in an effective/interesting manner that facilitated my learning - Poor
Presentation was fair, objective, and unbiased toward any product or program	Presentation was fair, objective, and unbiased toward any product or program - Excellent	Presentation was fair, objective, and unbiased toward any product or program - Very Good	Presentation was fair, objective, and unbiased toward any product or program - Good	Presentation was fair, objective, and unbiased toward any product or program - Fair	Presentation was fair, objective, and unbiased toward any product or program - Poor

Overall comments

Continuing Medical Education

05.13.26 | Atypical Anorexia: 'Normal' Weight Does Not Mean Low Risk

May Evaluation

May Evaluation

Select Credit Type

Obtain Your Certificate

Course navigation

You are here

05.13.26 | Atypical Anorexia: 'Normal' Weight Does Not Mean Low Risk

May Evaluation

May Evaluation

Select Credit Type

Obtain Your Certificate

Course navigation